Energies Media
  • Magazine
    • Digital Magazine
    • Digital Magazine Archive
  • Features
  • Upstream
  • Midstream
  • Downstream
  • Renewable
    • Solar
    • Wind
    • Hydrogen
    • Nuclear
  • People
  • Events
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Energies Media
No Result
View All Result

Tale of Two Vessels: Hedging Freight to Control Costs

by James Morgan
May 22, 2020
in Midstream, News, Oil and Gas News, Transportation
Tale of Two Vessels: Hedging Freight to Control Costs
Baker Hughes

Study ties Curtis Bay coal terminal work to neighborhood soot

Oil Companies Cut Millions in Wrong Places as Clean Energy Reshapes Industry

Find out why the combination of the Saudi/Russian oil price war and the global COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated a greater need for hedging freight costs. 

The COVID-19 pandemic has sent shock waves through the shipping industry. The supply glut of crude oil due to the Saudi/Russian price war and the declining demand due to global “stay at home” advisories sent tanker rates through the roof as oil traders and marketers scrambled to lock down floating storage. On the flip side, the shutdown, in attempts to mitigate further spread of the virus, has hurt supply chains worldwide and dried up the bulk cargo market.

While freight rates are typically cyclical, these world events have caused extreme highs and lows. In the past six weeks, spot tanker rates have been as much as five to 10 times higher than average, while one-year time charter rates nearly tripled for Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs).

Combining the typical lower seasonal demand with the virus impact, the Baltic Dry Index has dropped to its lowest since 2016 and is over 80% down from its September 2019 high.

In the charter market, these events have demonstrated a greater need for hedging freight costs just as a company would hedge any other energy commodity. Outside of a specific freight book, typical commodity trading companies aren’t looking to make substantial profits on their marine transportation. In today’s volatile commodity market, hedging freight costs should be an important component of a risk department’s overall control policies.

Tale of Two Vessels: Hedging Freight to Control Costs
Source: Alibra Shipping Limited

The Baltic Exchange has defined routes for Freight Forward Agreements (FFAs) that can be used as part of a freight book to hedge exposure to freight price changes. For example, a refiner on the U.S. Gulf Coast that regularly brings in Middle Eastern crude would use the TD01 benchmark to hedge themselves against fluctuations in the VLCC market. Depending on the exact route from the Middle East to the U.S. Gulf Coast, this may not be a perfect hedge, but it would likely be closely correlated. Using a combination of available FFAs against a company’s marine routes would provide a more stable freight cost.

Tale of Two Vessels: Hedging Freight to Control Costs
BDIY:IND – BDI Baltic Exchange Dry Index. Source: Bloomberg

Prior to the spike in one-year VLCC rates, the 2020 average had been around $42,000/day. An average voyage from the Middle East to the U.S. Gulf Coast is 30 days, giving an average freight cost of $1.26 million. When the prices spiked to $80,000/day, the voyage cost nearly doubled to $2.4 million. By having an effective hedging program in place, a charterer could have saved over $1 million per voyage.

Opportune LLP has extensive experience working with companies of all sizes in the downstream energy sector to develop and implement effective risk and hedging policies that meet ever-changing business plans. Our professionals offer the unique understanding of the hedging and operational processes that allow us to present alternatives that meet the needs of shipping and trading companies during these volatile times.

Author Profile
James Morgan
James Morgan
Director - Opportune LLP

James Morgan is a DirectorinOpportune LLP’s Process and Technology practice. James is an experienced consulting executive with over 18 years of experience in project management and solution delivery for the Energy industry. He is experienced in all aspects of a project life cycle from strategy definition and business case development to production support, for both packaged and custom software implementations. Prior to Opportune, James served as the Global Refining Lead for IT at LyondellBasell. James has worked on business process improvement and software implementation projects for natural gas, power, crude, refined products, NGLs, petrochemicals, softsandethanol. James’ scope of experience stretches acrossfront, middle and back-office operations. James has a B.S. in Information Systems and Decision Sciences (MIS) from Louisiana State University.

Author Articles
  • James Morgan
    https://energiesmedia.com/author/james-morgan/
    34877073 s
    March 25, 2019
    IMO 2020 Full Sail Ahead: Incoming Waves for Refiners, Shipowners
Qatar
TAMU

In This Issue

Energies Media Summer 2025

ENERGIES Media (Summer 2025)


Energies Media Interactive Crossword Puzzle – Summer 2025


Maximizing Clean Energy Tax Credits Under the Inflation Reduction Act


U.S. Oil Refineries Face Critical Capacity Test Amid Rising Demand


How to Deploy Next-Gen Energy Savers Without Disrupting Operations


Dewey Follett Bartlett, Jr.: Tulsa’s Champion of Independents


NeverNude Coveralls: A Practical Solution for Everyday Dignity


Meeting Emergency Preparedness and Response Criteria


Bringing Safety Forward in Offshore Operations


Letter from the Managing Editor (Summer 2025)


Moving Energy Across Space and Time


ENERGIES Cartoon (Summer 2025)


Why Energy Companies Need a CX Revolution


The Hidden Value in Waste Oil: A Sustainable Solution for the Future

E-Fuels
ADIPEC
  • Terms
  • Privacy

© 2025 by Energies Media

No Result
View All Result
  • Magazine
    • Digital Magazine
    • Digital Magazine Archive
  • Features
  • Upstream
  • Midstream
  • Downstream
  • Renewable
    • Solar
    • Wind
    • Hydrogen
    • Nuclear
  • People
  • Events
  • Advertise

© 2025 by Energies Media