Waters of the U.S. Rule Affects O&G Industries ‘Almost from Top to Bottom’

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Water Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States” affects the oil and natural gas industries “almost from top to bottom, and more in the midstream and upstream sectors,” Lowell Rothschild, an attorney in the environmental strategies group with Bracewell & Giuliani in Austin, told Oilman on July 7.

The rule was signed by EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy on May 27, and is slated to go into effect on Aug. 28.

“In the upstream sector, for activities such as pad construction and spill control, to the extent that there are more waters now identified as jurisdictional waters, there will be more need for wetland permitting and mitigation as well as spill control,” Rothschild said. “On the construction side, for wetlands, a lot of permitting relies on fairly standardized nationwide permits, but those nationwide permits have acreage limits, so to the extent that additional impacts are going to occur, for instance when constructing a pad, there’s a definite possibility that individual permits would be needed.”

Rothschild noted that individual permits are not only more time consuming, but they also call into play additional environmental requirements, such as National Environmental Policy Act review, and Endangered Species Act consultation.

“It is a lengthy and expensive process,” he said.

The rule also may cause costs to increase for the midstream sector.

“A lot of new pipeline constructions rely heavily on, for instance, nationwide permit 12, and to the extent that there are more waters identified under the rule, there’s either going to be more costs associated with avoiding those waters or it will require additional mitigation for the impacts that will occur to the newly identified jurisdictional waters,” he said.

In an effort to clarify the scope of waters protected under the Clean Water Act, the rule defines tributaries that affect downstream waters, and protects prairie potholes, Carolina and Delmarva bays, pocosins, western vernal pools in California, and Texas coastal prairie wetlands when they impact downstream waters. In addition, the rule reduces the use of case-specific analysis of waters.

To date, 27 states, including Texas, Louisiana, Ohio, Michigan and North Dakota have filed suit against the EPA, and on July 2, the American Petroleum Institute joined 13 other national trade organizations in a lawsuit filed with the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, challenging the legality of the rule.

According to Rothschild, the state and private lawsuits outline the same general concerns about the rule – that the rule exceeds the scope of the agency’s authority under the Clean Water Act and exceeds the limits on the agency’s jurisdiction. The lawsuits also claim that there were significant changes between the proposed rule and the final rule, and interested parties did not have time to comment on the rule as finalized.

“The states also have their standard 10th Amendment concerns, which are that the Clean Water Act specifically reserves for states the authority, to the extent compatible with the Clean Water Act, to maintain their powers over local land use and water use,” Rothschild said. “The states that have sued are concerned that the rule impinges on that authority.”

Rothschild noted that the chances are slim that there will be a stay on the Aug. 28 implementation date for the rule.

“It’s typically very difficult for entities to stay an EPA rule generally, and it’s fairly difficult to stay an environmental rule more specifically,” he said. “Because the states are involved in the lawsuits, and they have a particularized harm, there’s a slightly better chance than normal that the rule might be stayed, but it still is not a very significant chance.”

Author Profile
jennifer delony
Managing Editor
CCUS
InventU


Three Bottom-line Building Ways 3D Printing is Quietly Revolutionizing the Oil and Gas Industry


Why Big Data in M&A Doesn’t Work


Energy Scene: Oil Patch BBQs


RRC’s Porter Testifies on Oil Export Ban


Take A Bow


Q&A with Jason Spiess: Brian Lash – Target Logistics


Railroad Administration Releases Rule on Unattended Trains


Severe Flooding Led to ‘significant downtime’ at Mid-Con Properties in 2Q15


Senate Committee Unveils Energy Policy Modernization Act


Developing Technology: Humble Oil (Standard Oil) Offshore Rig 1950s


API: Proposed rule ‘could make offshore operations less safe’


FERC Begins Environmental Review of Four Texas Liquefaction Projects


Targeted Training with the LWCC Mobile Safety Training Center: Customer Testimony


Texas Allocates $4.47M to Seismic Monitoring Program


How to Thrive as an Exhibitor in the Face of Low Oil Prices


Iran Agreement is Two-headed Monster


Oilman Cartoon – September/October 2015


Transportation & Logistics History: J.M. English Trucking Company Early 1930s


Texas Oil and Gas Association Promotes Resources That Improve Oilfield Safety, Save Lives at 2015 Houston Oilfield Expo


Oklahoma Regulators Expand ‘areas of interest’ for Disposal Well Directive


Stellar Amenities: Halliburton Workers Prepare a Well Deserved Meal Early 1950s


Gulf South Pipeline Submits Application for Coastal Bend Header Project


A Family Company Dedicated to the Industry


Waters of the U.S. Rule Affects O&G Industries ‘Almost from Top to Bottom’


BOEM Issues Record of Decision for Western Gulf of Mexico Planning Area Lease Sale


Rules and Standards


Why Your Dedicated Employees are Your Worst Enemy


The Original Oilmen: Glenn McCarthy and Michel T. Halbouty Early 1930s


Nothing Moves Without Energy!


America Resources Acquires Interest in East Texas Wells


Industry Reacts to EPA Actions


Safety Offshore: Halliburton Diver Servicing a Blowout Off the Coast of Louisiana Early 1950s


Magnolia LNG, Meridian LNG Sign Capacity Agreement


Oil & Gas History: Texas Iron Works Early 1930s


DOE Grants G2 LNG Authority to Export to Countries with U.S. Free Trade Agreements


FERC to Prepare EA for San Elizario Crossing Project

E-Fuels
TAMU