An Indiana court has ruled that Hoosier utility regulators “impermissibly applied” the state law when they allowed Duke Energy to raise prices for customers to try to recover some of the costs associated with coal ash compliance. The court reversed the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission’s decision and ordered Hoosier to stop raising prices and to immediately dismiss Duke’s rate increase application. The ruling has been welcomed by several public interest institutions aimed at representing the interests of the average American.
The Indiana Court of Appeals has given the people of the region a win against high prices
Every single American is slowly being subjected to increases in cost across several key sectors of everyday life. The rising cost of living in the United States has seen increases in the cost of everything from cars to eggs, and more in between. In 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency implemented new rules for treating and disposing of toxic coal ash, and Duke has several coal-powered electricity generation plants in Indiana.
They began to spend essential money to try to comply with the new regulations. And have recently put in an application to try to recoup some of those operational costs by increasing prices for customers, which did not go down well, to say the least. Several organizations have reportedly planned to challenge the action. And the court agrees with them.
The Indiana Court of Appeals has reversed the action taken by Duke Energy over the past four years
The court has ruled that Duke’s plan to increase prices over the past four years was considered illegal retroactive ratemaking. Which speaks volumes about the company’s policies and views of their customer base, of which there are millions. Duke Energy operates several sites in the Indiana region, and the apparent price increases amount to a total of around $88 million in costs incurred from 2019 through 2023.
They even had plans to expand their recouperation efforts for the period between 2024 and 2030, claiming $238 million in projected operational costs in that time frame. Judge Paul Mathias delivered the ruling, which his colleagues on the bench agreed with.
“As our Supreme Court has made clear: ‘a statute operates prospectively when it is applied to the operative event of the statute, and that event occurs after the statute took effect,’ – Judge Paul Mathias of the Indiana Court of Appeals
The ruling also encouraged the Citizens Action Coalition to pursue legal action and sue Duke, which creates a split in the energy sector in the region. The Trump administration has led efforts to increase production in the energy sector across the board and will surely see the ruling as a mere speed bump on the way to energy independence for the United States.
“This is a big win. It’s quite simply, from our perspective, retroactive rate making, which is not allowed. The commission should have known better, and now we’re pretty happy with this (decision). Duke challenged our standing in the case and the court rejected those arguments soundly. We’ve seen more and more challenges on standing, so that (decision) was good.” – Kerwin Olson, Executive Director of Citizens Action Coalition
Will the federal government take steps to intervene in the court ruling
In the midst of all these court rulings and supposed interventions from the federal government, the ruling could be a positive one for the customer base, but ultimately, the industry will feel the effects on the levels of production in the downstream sector. The recent news of Nigeria’s struggles with its workforce has accelerated the Trump administration’s job creation efforts in the energy sector, no doubt aiming to avoid any more legal actions. Will the Trump government intervene? Time will tell.
Disclaimer: Our coverage of events affecting companies is purely informative and descriptive. Under no circumstances does it seek to promote an opinion or create a trend, nor can it be taken as investment advice or a recommendation of any kind.
